modelsentiment
← Leaderboard

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic · Claude Fable series · released 9 Jun 2026 · as of 13 Nov, 20:12 UTC

58
02550751000 = all negative · 50 = neutral · 100 = all positive

No clear lean

Reddit has no clear lean on Claude Fable 5: an index of 58 from 19 opinions in 18 threads last 7 days; its 95% interval, 45–71, crosses neutral 50. An early read: fewer than 30 opinions. An early read ranks after the 25 full reads: 33rd of the 44 rated models.

On benchmarks: 5th of 128 on Arena text, 6th of 69 on the coding index.

Per day

The last 14 UTC days. Each day's own index at its value, with its 95% interval.

  1. Sat 31 Oct0
    0 opinions, no index below 10
  2. Sun 1 Nov1
    1 opinion, no index below 10
  3. Mon 2 Nov0
    0 opinions, no index below 10
  4. Tue 3 Nov0
    0 opinions, no index below 10
  5. Wed 4 Nov1
    1 opinion, no index below 10
  6. Thu 5 Nov1
    1 opinion, no index below 10
  7. Fri 6 Nov1
    1 opinion, no index below 10
  8. Sat 7 Nov0
    0 opinions, no index below 10
  9. Sun 8 Nov4
    4 opinions, no index below 10
  10. Mon 9 Nov2
    2 opinions, no index below 10
  11. Tue 10 Nov5
    5 opinions, no index below 10
  12. Wed 11 Nov5
    5 opinions, no index below 10
  13. Thu 12 Nov1
    1 opinion, no index below 10
  14. Fri 13 Nov2 so far
    2 opinions, no index below 10

Is Claude Fable 5 getting worse?

Too few opinions to say. A full read needs 30 opinions from 20 threads and 20 accounts; Claude Fable 5 has 19 opinions from 18 threads and 19 accounts last 7 days.

Reddit and the benchmarks

Its rank on each list, bottom to top. Outside numbers sit beside Reddit and never feed its index. Hover a name for the value and its source.

  1. #33 of 44 rated here
  2. #5 of 128 on Arena
  3. #19 of 94 on Arena
  4. #10 of 107 at Artificial Analysis
  5. #6 of 69 at Artificial Analysis
  6. #9 of 56 at Artificial Analysis
  7. #11 of 96 at Epoch

$10 in / $50 out per million tokens · 1M context · reasoning mode · OpenRouter, 13 Nov

Per subreddit

The model's index within each subreddit, from 10 opinions; faded below 30 opinions, 20 threads or 20 accounts.

Threads behind the opinions

The 18 threads with the most opinions about this model. A thread's index reads the opinions in it, not the post, and shows from 10 opinions.

ThreadSubredditOpinionsIndex
As a GPT user, I used Opus 5.5 once and i feel incredibly lied to by benchmarksin 2 commentsr/ClaudeAI2–
Fable 5.2 uses so much usage it’s basically pointless to usein 1 commentr/ClaudeCode1–
Anyone tried Fable 5.2 yet?in 1 commentr/SillyTavernAI1–
Fable 5.2in 1 commentr/ClaudeAI1–
Anyone finds Fable 5 better than Fable 5.1 and 5.2?r/ClaudeAI1–
I’ve noticed Fable 5.2 just feels… off?in 1 commentr/ClaudeCode1–
Argon vs Carbonin 1 commentr/SillyTavernAI1–
Is fable 5.2 actually worse than opus 5.5 In most cases ?in 1 commentr/ClaudeAI1–
Gemini 4 Argon and Carbon score 91.7% and 92.6% on SimpleBench respectively. But Claude Fable 5.2 scores 94.9%, putting it in the lead instead.in 1 commentr/singularity1–
Fable 5.2 vs Opus 5.5in 1 commentr/claude1–
Fable 5.2 nerfed??in 1 commentr/Anthropic1–
Fable 51.8 is UNUSABLE on Pro. Hit my limit after ONE (1) prompt. Cancelled.in 1 commentr/ClaudeAI1–
Fable 5.2 is so addictivein 1 commentr/claude1–
Fable 5.2 is here! 30% cheaper and much cheaper than Fable 5.1in 1 commentr/ClaudeCode1–
Introducing Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2in 1 commentr/singularity1–
I'm confused with the models...in 1 commentr/ClaudeAI1–
Opus 5.5 is obviously nerfed - how's Fable 5.1?in 1 commentr/claude1–
Claude’s Writing is Soullessin 1 commentr/claude1–

Weekly email

Every Monday: the warmest and coldest models, and who moved beyond noise. No tracking; one click unsubscribes.